<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="" src="https://dc.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=642652&amp;fmt=gif">

PFAS as Emergent Chemicals - What Investors Need to Know

By BBJ Group | January 31, 2018

Blog Post Title Highlighted Words in Blue

Written by Andrew Bajorat, CHMM, Principal at BBJ Group

What are perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)?

In 2016, the USEPA issued a drinking water health advisory for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), which are part of a class of substances called perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).  These compounds have recently received increased regulatory scrutiny, as well as media coverage.

PFOA and PFOS were commonly added to fabrics and packaging to improve stain resistance. In addition, PFOA and PFOS were components of foams used for fire suppression, particularly at civilian and military airfields.

These compounds have been recently identified in some drinking water sources, which has generated understandable public concern.

What are sources of PFAS in the environment?

Cleanups involving PFAS are generally centered around airfields (where they are a component found in fire suppression foams), landfills which may have accepted wastes containing PFAS, and facilities that may have used PFAS to provide stain resistance to textiles. 

A paper published in Environmental Science and Technology (Hu, et al 2016) [1] presents known hydrological units where PFASs have been detected in the lower 48 states.  These hydrological units appear widespread, but generally appear close to well-populated areas.

AWB Blog

Why are PFAS dangerous?

PFAS are resistant to degradation and have been in widespread use for over 60 years. USEPA reports that peer-reviewed studies suggest that developmental effects may occur in fetuses or breastfed infants, and that cancer, liver effects, and decreased immunity may also occur at adverse concentrations. 

Consequently, USEPA issued a non-enforceable health advisory level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt) for the combined concentrations of PFOA and PFOS.  But other jurisdictions have taken a stronger approach.  For example:

  • In May 2017, Minnesota Department of Health issued guidance values of 27 ppt for PFOS and 35 ppt for PFOA;
  • In November 2017, California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) added PFOA and PFOS to the list of chemicals known to the state to cause reproductive toxicity, which triggers certain requirements under Proposition 65.
  • In January 2018, the state of Michigan established enforceable cleanup criteria that mirror the 70 ppt USEPA health advisory level (which is unenforceable). The state of Michigan recently used these new enforceable criteria to sue an in-state tannery accused of impacting a local drinking water source.

Effects on Acquisitions

Even for companies who have not used PFAS historically, there are still things to be aware of, particularly during an acquisition:

  • Pay particular attention to proximity to airfields that may have used PFASs or landfills that may have accepted PFAS-containing wastes.
  • Given the recent, emergent awareness about PFASs, previous investigations may not have sampled for PFASs. Consequently, PFASs may represent a possible re-opener  for “closed” sites with existing NFA letters.
  • For water-intensive industries, investigate whether PFAS-related sources may be nearby.
  • In a stock acquisition, evaluate whether the target company may have disposed of wastes at a landfill that may have also accepted PFAS wastes.

 

[1]Detection of Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in U.S. Drinking Water Linked to Industrial Sites, Military Fire Training Areas, and Wastewater Treatment Plants.  http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00260

 

Topics: Remediation and Site Restoration


Recent Posts

Understanding California's Environmental Regulatory Framework

read more

5 Steps to A Successful Air Permit Application

read more

Using CCDDs for Uncontaminated Soil Disposal

read more